Scrum conceals bad teams.

by Jun 17, 2024

Scrum conceals bad teams.

Far too often, we confuse Scrum with a magic wand that transforms any team into a high-performing ‘dream team’.

It’s tempting to believe that the sprint system, with its regular completion and initiation of tasks, gives us an agile and collaborative team.

Look closer. If the team was dysfunctional to start with, Scrum merely conceals the issues.

From the outside, the team appears to be a well-oiled machine. They’re closing tasks. They’re planning new ones. They’re meeting frequently. Surely, they’re effective, right?

Wrong.

In reality, these activities often end up being a smokescreen. They create an illusion of productivity and cooperation.

Poor performing teams can hide behind a veneer of ‘busy-ness’ and ‘teamwork’, while significant issues remain unaddressed.

The cost? Time. Developers burn hours in meetings, tasks and troubleshooting just to maintain this facade.

But why should we allow this to continue?

It’s time to look beyond the surface. Let’s confront the illusion!

#
Remy van Duijkeren

Remy van Duijkeren

Power Platform Advisor

Microsoft Power Platform Advisor with over 25 years of experience in IT with a focus on (marketing) automation and integration.

Helping organizations with scaling their business by automating processes on the Power Platform (Dynamics 365).

Expert in Power Platform, Dynamics 365 (Marketing & Sales) and Azure Integration Services. Giving advice and strategy consultancy.

Services:
– Strategy and tactics advise
– Automating and integrating

Subscribe to
The Daily Friction

A daily newsletter on automation and eliminating friction

Related Content

Backlog: The Black Hole of ideas

Backlog: The Black Hole of ideas Is your backlog turning into an ever-expanding universe of forgotten dreams? We all know that mix—a jumble of big ideas and tiny tasks waiting for their day in the sun. Some items linger for years. Why do backlogs grow? Because we...

read more

The Trade-off Between Budgets and Quality ⚖️

The Trade-off Between Budgets and Quality ⚖️ In my previous post, I talked about shifting from Estimates to Budgets for feature development 💡. Let's dive deeper. Using a Budget instead of an Estimate introduces a trade-off: Scope and Quality adjust to fit the time...

read more

Budgets instead of Estimates

Budgets instead of Estimates Estimating a feature is difficult and is often a guess (or even a lie). An Estimate is for a fixed scope. So, you need to think deeply how to implement the feature, before giving an Estimate. The business can then use the Estimate to...

read more